This article was co-authored with Steve LeBlanc, one of my favorite collaborators.

lassi_kurkijarvi

Social learning is not just the technology of social media, although it makes use of it. It is not merely the ability to express yourself in a group of opt-in friends. Social learning combines social media tools with a shift in the corporate culture, a shift that encourages ongoing knowledge transfer and connects people in ways that make learning a joy.

Social learning thrives in a culture of service and wonder. It is inspired by leaders, enabled by technology and ignited by opportunities that have only recently unfolded.

If a culture is focused on service, the most pressing question is, “How can I help you?” How can I help you succeed? How can I help you ask strong questions, take wise risks and deliver great content? How can I help you prosper? Most importantly, how can I help you learn and make new connections? How can I help you serve the larger group, of which we are both a part?

Yet in most classrooms, young people are prevented from helping each other learn and succeed. In some communities, concern for property values and yard maintenance outweigh assisting neighbors. In many companies, talk of competitors and departmental politics overshadow someone’s need for mentoring or gaining fresh perspective. Over 60 years ago, W. Edwards Demming encouraged management to drive out fear and break down barriers between departments, and still worry and walls are the two constants that most organizations share.

Part of why we are not better at helping one another learn and grow is that our attention is spread thin. There is so much going on. We haven’t built this notion of serving into the business cycle; into our daily work. Nor have we dismantled the myth that fear and embarrassment somehow motivates people to learn. By choosing wisely where we place our attention, we have more attention and enthusiasm to give. Or as Clay Shirky put it at Web 2.0 Expo NY, “It’s not information overload. It’s filter failure.”

Social learning is accelerated when we give our attention to individuals, groups and projects that interest and energize us. We self-select the themes we want to follow and filter out those that feel burdensome, all with impunity. No one gets offended when we don’t follow a project outside our domain. No one notices when we temporarily filter out the rants of people beating their own drum.

It’s the technology of social learning, and social media in general, that allows us to regulate our attention to those areas where we can gain the highest return on investment, and put our best contributions out into the world. It’s the culture of social learning that helps identify how those contributions are important to us all.

Requests for help, feedback and insight can be made without burden, without coercion, without fear. It takes time, though. You don’t simply announce a culture of service one day in the hope that everyone will figure it out.

Growing a culture of service is more like planting a garden than building a shed. A garden requires tending, whereas a shed is built once. A social learning culture requires design, training, guidance, leadership, monitoring and celebrating successes, large and small. People need to know where the organization is headed and why it matters. It’s not easy for people to make the shift from a culture where they fear they are not good enough and need to improve, to one where they feel safe enough to want to improve for the enjoyment of it. Some will think it impossible for a whole culture to shift from fear-based fixes to joy-based learning, from coercion to inspiration. Others have witnessed it and will cheer along.

The trail is being blazed by some unexpected players, including IBM Lotus and the CIA. We do not know all of what it takes to make this cultural shift work. There is still a kind of magic in the soup. But from our own work and the illustrative examples from groups like the 2.0 Adoption Council, we are seeing stunning examples of where it works. When done well, the results are nothing short of magical.

Think of asking someone out. A trip to Spain is a larger request than a local dinner, which is larger than meeting for coffee. The larger the request, the more pressure and the more difficult it is to back out. The smaller your request, the more fun you make it to participate. Whether courting customers, friends or romance, demonstrate your interest by listening and connecting. Help them succeed.

The easier the tools make it for people to tell us what they need, the easier and more enjoyable it is to be genuinely helpful. The technology and culture of social learning can create an environment where you are enthusiastically supported, where your sense of wonder returns and creativity blossoms — where people thrive.

[lassi_kurkijarvi/CC BY-NC 2.0]

Originally published on Fast Company’s Learn At All Levels by Marcia Conner and Steve LeBlanc.

———-

Steve LeBlanc (@sleveo), public speaker, corporate trainer and holistic healer sees opportunities everywhere for learning and helping people connect.

Marcia Conner (@marciamarcia), works with senior leaders to put collaborative technology into action. Her new book, The New Social Learning with Tony Bingham address how to thrive with social business and more.

{ 3 comments }

Social messaging offers much more than collaboration when individuals include their multidimensional perspectives in the Enterprise stream.

I began using Twitter out of spite. Fast Company had a mass website upgrade and some links weren’t working. Our editor was suddenly unreachable (after saying we should contact her if we needed any help). I had a deadline and I was stuck. Looking for additional contact information in Plaxo, I saw she was tweeting from a cab, commenting on the messenger’s bike beside her.

Whua? Did she not realize people could see her goofing off? Quickly enough, she answered my question and I was on my way. I wondered what could be so compelling about Twitter for someone with her busy schedule to use it. She’s brilliant, with many pursuits; could Twitter be that beneficial, for someone like her?

I became determined to find out.
I opened a Twitter account.
I posted several updates.
By the end of the first week…
I understood.

In the year since, I credit Lynne for turning me on to Twitter and I’ve discovered something more valuable than the hyped “collaborative sharing” benefits. I’ve witnessed coworkers outside of clearly defined roles. I’ve peeked into their thoughts, admired their perspectives and felt their passions. This fuels my trust and broadens my access to them. I now see a well-roundedness attained previously only by spending long hours together, usually outside of normal work hours — and who has time for that? Learning about Lynne’s zest for bicycles and exchange, I became more committed to her success.

Before Twitter (and her enterprise-strength counterparts) we didn’t share our layered thoughts casually so we appeared always on task. Via Twitter, you now see my mind periodically follows tangents, that sometimes circle back, and other times leads to wholly new roads. Engaging with a wide circle of people — celebrating our focuses and interests along the edge — deepens and widens everything we do.

Here are four reasons to connect work with the personal — the insights and the whys.

Establish Your Voice
People don’t necessarily tweet about their job. They tweet about their work; what they’re passionate about, their craft. When we admit we have other dimensions, be more transparent, and practice authenticity, we provide a context to our thoughts and our behaviors while also becoming comfortable with them in public.

Mix Up Silos
Innovation comes from seeing the old in fresh ways, sussing out subtleties and trends, and adding unique twists. Thinking laterally then offers endless directions to branch out. Sparks fly and fresh ideas emerge at the intersection of wildly divergent memes. Tell me one… more… time about your demo and it’s unlikely I’ll have an epiphany. Twitter about something you learned from a stranger while searching for the room — now you have my attention.

Build Trusted Relationships
I once read it takes new coworkers five months to trust one another enough for true collaboration. In my experience, that time is longer if you never spend time together in person, getting a feel for their priorities, experiencing firsthand their eccentricities, witnessing their humanity among to-dos. Something changes when you witness their adoration of bedtime stories, fine poetry, drooling mutts or Trader Joe’s. What you might have interpreted as an all-business style lightens as you realize you would welcome them on a camping trip or stuck beside you on a long late-night flight.

And possibly most critical at this moment in history…

Preserve the Soul
Moving forward — as a species, a society, an economy on the verge of doing itself in — means inviting in the portions of the self we once left in the car. It’s long past time we liberate the parts of ourselves that don’t belong to our employers so our full selves can do their best work. The poet David Whyte says, “In a sense, the very part of us that doesn’t have the least interest in the organization is our greatest offering to it. It is the part that opens the window of the imagination and allows fresh air into the meeting room. It is the part that can put its foot on the brake when the organization is running itself off a cliff.”

By the way, I don’t encourage endless drivel about traffic as you putter toward the client’s office, nor suggest you post minutia about your lunch to fill time. I advocate edu-tweeting and adding other things personally important to the enterprise stream so people at work benefit from a richer you.

The trouble with broaching this delicate topic, though, reminding leaders and learners everywhere that work is more than making cogs, is what Terry Pratchett calls Réjà Vu: The feeling that I will be here again. In the meantime, let’s at least begin to open a few more windows. If there is a bicycle beside you, all the better.

Share your multidimensional insights here or 140-characters at a time on Twitter @marciamarcia.

This article originally appeared in Fast Company.

{ 0 comments }

As the enterprise microsharing market (aka “Twitter inside Business”) grows, I hear from skeptical leaders befuddled by this trend, wanting to be reassured their people aren’t simply wasting time. Here are specific questions I’ve received and how I respond to each.

Question: How can all of this yammering be good for business and my bottom line?

Answer: In tough economical times, business managers seem to become critical of every activity even those generating the energy required for success. Break down the hype you have about what fosters your competitive advantage and you may come to realize your only lasting competitive advantage is the ability to learn and apply the right things faster than your competitors. Once you’re there, you’ll probably notice innovations and learnings come largely from the little moments between the activities we’ve previously thought of as jobs.

Microsharing (a less intimidating term than microblogging) is astounding my clients as it liberates and bridges information in and around their organization in ways they hadn’t even known they were missing before. Sure, its use needs to be managed, but the same could be said about telephones, email and meetings.

Let me answer this in a different way, too, though. Before focusing your accusations on social software, do a quick reality-check about the methods and measure of how people around your organization are communicating and collaborating today. Knowledge is fundamentally social.

In my experience, the earliest adopters of microsharing tools are technically savvy people who were already having these conversations, just not as easily or with as strong of results. They were the ones on their phones, on email discussion lists, in bulletin boards, or talking it up with the people in their physical proximity. Twitter (or her enterprise counterparts) didn’t spawn this behavior. People seeking the next great aha-erlebnis weren’t the wall flowers who kept to themselves. They were social enough already to know they did their best when engaged with other people. These tools just harnessed their focus, gave them a single user interface, and a question from which to launch from.

“What are you doing?” gave way to, “What have you learned today other people should know about?” “Anyone know the answer to my question?” and “Check out this research. It has the potential to change the way we work.”

Q: Will these super short messages that some people write so frequently open us up to litigation?

A: Enterprise microsharing doesn’t introduce new legal issues. Whenever an employee shares information, there is the possibility of leaking sensitive information or financial data that wasn’t suppose to get out. The issues of most enterprise 2.0 tools are the same issues and concerns raised when we saw email leaving our servers for the first time. When we’re communicating about things that matter, people have a tendency to become personal. What creates emotional nearness can also be construed as too private for correspondence of any length.

If you’re part of an industry like securities and exchange that must maintain records of all correspondence, you’ll need to comply with regulations and capture these exchanges, too. If you’re in a business that handles sensitive information, you likely have already implemented strong policies prohibiting people from sharing those details. If you suspect your people need to be reminded this is one more communications tool that can be abused, remind them of their responsibilities rather than blame the tool or ban it out of fear it will be the source of a problem.

Your company should have a list of policies regarding social media to ensure trade secrets remain secret, personal lives don’t become public, financial information doesn’t get advertised, and there are consequences clearly stated about using these tools for negative publicity. Make the conversation about how to communicate wisely and in line with the ethical standards you maintain for your company overall. If you seek specifics, Legal OnRamp has developed a Web 2.0 and The Law wiki for members of the legal community to focus on issues relevant to this space.

Q: Is social software going to unravel organizational systems?

A: Modern approaches that help people work and talk together don’t replace organizational systems; they extend age-old arrangements of how people have self-organized throughout time.

As John Bordeaux explains, social media represents an affirmation of the organization as ecosystem. It introduces diverse voices into the value network and, along with organizational network analysis, reveals that every organization is more than the employees, and is best understood, examined, and managed as an ecosystem.

Yes, it challenges the hierarchical delivery of information we use to manage our work lives, but that is a challenge to hierarchy, not to organizational theory. And before you declare the death of hierarchy, consider that this is an artifact of our sociology. It will take more than twitter to reverse the anthropological and sociological imperatives of hierarchy. If anything, microsharing represents a different kind of organizational system, one based on knowledge, quality and timeliness of data, and subjective merit.

Poet Brian Andreas could have been writing about the short bursts of information shared when he wrote, “These are little scraps of magic & when you paste them together you get a memory of something fine & strong.”

Have a questions you’d like me to answer? Ask in the comments or in fewer than 140 characters @marciamarcia

Originally published on Fast Company’s Learn At All Levels by Marcia Conner.

{ 4 comments }

“I was expecting people to be dragging large sacks of rocks behind them,” said Ben Brooks, VP and Practice Leader of Human Capital Management (HCM) at a giant risk-management firm. “But it wasn’t like that at all. Speakers were forward thinking yet practical, and people at the event were talking about real business challenges in the context of the huge potential of social software.”

When sharing his impressions of last week’s human resources geek-fest, the HR Technology Conference, put on by Bill Kutik and HR Executive Magazine, Ben voiced what many people not at the event probably feared too.

Human resource management, in general, not just those who focus on HR information systems, is rarely considered a glamorous career. HR Executive magazine recently reported that 80% of HR officers believe their stress level has gone up considerably in the last 18 months. The recession and a lack of focus on business metrics has given them more work and set their chairs on fire. Many in hot seats feel they’ve carried around those rocks for long enough.

Although McCormick Place, with its escalators facing the wrong direction and a shortage of women’s bathroom stalls might seem prophetic, this wasn’t a show around a small campfire or inside a cave. You could almost see the sun rising over people’s heads and them looking up in anticipation of the new dawn.

The conference began with a keynote by Tammy Erickson, author of What’s Next, Gen X and Retire Retirement: Career Strategies for the Boomer Generation. Her message left me longing to hear how she believes HR execs can begin initiating collaborative projects (her focus was on why they should). A quick poll afterword of those sitting around me, from a “20th Century icon” company, however, said her message was what they needed to hear. She painted a picture of the inevitable future in language they could use back in Detroit to talk about where HR needs to go. They believe that HR leaders need to overcome the perception they only care about payroll and benefits. Those are still important, but they represent only a small piece of their job to create a workplace for the future.

My favorite part of Tammy’s talk illuminated how scientists know Cro-Magnon collaborated. They don’t see emails or cave wall cartoons talking about meeting up after work. Evidence comes from tools that have been found which required more that two hands to create. This supports a point I make often: collaboration is not only about the conversation; rather it’s about what we can create jointly. Together we can do more.

Before the keynote, I sat down with Bond Talent US CEO Tim Giehll to talk about what he calls the Human Capital Supply Chain. I wanted to know how this differed from what I refer to as a “people-centric value chain.” Like the covers of our books, which look eerily similar, our perspectives overlapped in many ways. We share a frustration with the lack of rigorous yet people-friendly systems to accurately analyze conditions for people-management to succeed. We both look to optimized supply chain methods, not just as metaphors, but actual practices to improve the employee lifecycle. Although a manufacturing focus may seem impersonal, Tim points out that it can make sure the right people are in the right jobs at the right time.

The Social Learning breakout session, lead by Jeanne Meister co-author of The 2020 Workforce, was one I couldn’t miss. Panelists included Robert Campbell (VP & CLO, Cerner Corporation), Don McLaughlin (CLO, Cisco), Laurence Smith Laurence Smith (VP, Global L&D, LG Electronics), and Susan Steele (National TD Director, Deloitte). Each introduced formidable case studies for learning together at work. Examples included Deloitte’s inside the firewall D Street online social network to Yelp consumer-oriented local rating service. Each focused of what people were learning, not just connecting with people they know. The only thing lacking in the session was a clear definition of social learning—which Jeanne had tried to crowdsource from the audience. People said things like, “it’s collaborative” and “tools to help leverage learning from people,” which are accurate but lack the foundation needed for people to say, “yes, that’s social learning/no, that’s not.” I define social learning by first defining another loose term.

Social media is technology used to engage three or more people.
Social learning is participating with others to make sense of new ideas.
What’s new is how they powerfully work together.

In meetings that afternoon, I spoke with luminary Gary Durbin, who I hadn’t seen in over a decade. Never one to soften a blow, he said it was OK for me to quote him saying, “The beaches are littered with the bones of HR people who had a good idea but couldn’t do anything about it.” His latest company SynchSource is working with Advantec doing compelling work in the human capital management space offering extremely flexible, scalable and workflow-oriented solutions. They had just announced that two years and 600 small to mid-market clients later, they were in stealth mode no more. The red medical scrubs touting the Kardiant logo visually pounded out that point. I look forward to following their progress and watching their hearts beat.

Meeting with Saba VP and GM of People Management Solutions, Yvette Cameron, was for more than just hearing what’s new in Saba’s “people strategy.” It was a candid conversation about the challenges learning management systems (LMS) vendors face when trying to show the market their vision and solid tool-suites represent a way to power up people. I applaud Saba for moving into the Enterprise 2.0 space with Saba Live because it shows the intersection of identity and reputation-driven profiles built through their HCM and talent management systems, and the little interchanges that lead to making informed decisions at work. Don’t expect me to overturn my call for organizations to consider turning off their LMS if it has trapped the organization’s thinking about what is learning rather than recording it, then setting memes free. LMS hold learning like a jar trying to hold sunshine. Let’s hope Saba’s move into HCM and talent management, and now E2.0 finally shows the marketplace it time to set the light free.

Dave Duffield and Aneel Bhusri, Workday co-founders, began by asking themselves what they would do if they could do what they did PeopleSoft again. For starters, they’d focus on how busy people would use their HR systems. The user-experience would be friendly, mobile, easy to update, and in the cloud. I met with Leighanne Levensaler and Andrew McCarthy to talk about Workday’s HCM strategy and quickly moved into a conversation about the vital role Workday Labs plays in bringing innovation and enhancements into future products. They are currently looking at things like natural workspaces, data filters, and, well of course for people-people, collaboration. We also talked about how Workday Community provides a sandbox where customers learn from one another rather than rely on the vendor to provide all the answers. In each workday, together we are smarter than any one of us.

The general session on the second day was as educational as it was entertaining. Jim Holincheck and Jason Averbook debated most every aspect of HR. Referee and conference host Bill Kutik spurred on talk about how the profession could use social technology to round a corner and what role analytics would play in HR’s success. What Jim and Jason lacked in street fighting skills they made up for in depth and candor. While we all truly missed Naomi Lee Bloom, it was wonderfully modern of her to be tweeting Bill new questions, RTing interesting points and being there in more than spirit. Her brains were on deck. I encourage every conference host to take a page from this playbook. Put two good speakers with strong points of view on stage to go point/counterpoint on the issues facing attendees, in not today then ahead. Think of this as the conference-circuit’s equivalent to reality TV. All the emotion and drama without the rehearsals or scripts. Conference 2.0 needs to show honesty and real-life theater, bubbling up in the moment, showing no one has all the answers. We’re each doing the best we can.

The Bloggers Insights panel, lea by Kris Dunn (The HR Capitali$t) was another best practice, not just talking about technology but how people put it into use. Bryon Abramowitz (The HR Technologist) and the newest blogger on the panel explained why it’s never too late to start writing if there’s a blog inside you. Trish McFarlane (HR Ringleader) opened attendees’ eyes by sharing that St. Louis Children’s Hospital hired her because of what they learned about her from her blog. Mike Krupa (InfoBox) talked about how and why HR technology is the perfect topic for him to blog about. And Laurie Ruettimann (The Cynical Girl), perhaps the best speaker I heard at the event, modeled that HR leaders can and should be themselves. She offered quips like, “Most HR info out there is ungodly boring…this is why our blogs do so well…we’re storytellers,” and, “The people in Chicago aren’t unemployed because the pictures they post on Facebook.” She reminded everyone that oftentimes HR’s focus on policies and procedures gets in the way of talking about what really matters. A blog is a modern means to provide a human voice and lead the good charge.

One big surprise for me (aside from not getting home Thursday night because of East Coast storm flight delays) was a meeting with PeopleMatter CEO, Nate DaPore. In addition to his Ross Mayfieldesqe appearance and effervescence, he’s found an underserved market, a brilliant intersection of previously disjointed talent management-oriented processes, and a spot on UI. When asked if he plans on talking this approach to other verticals, he said “no” emphatically. Other vendors should sigh with relief.

Two quick highs came from talking briefly with HR Executive Publisher, David Shadovitz (whose letters from the editor are possibly the only ones I read faithfully in any magazine), and a 10 minute 1:1 catch up with Dave Duffield at the annual PeopleSoft Alumni party. I could devote a year of blog posts to lessons Dave’s taught me about work, life, and doing what you know is right.

Two more extended highlights came as a result of lengthy private discussions. One was with Laurence Smith, VP of Global Learning & Development at LG Electronics. We talked about the challenges he faces in Korea relating to knowledge transfer and a workforce culture where people equate learning with multiple-choice tests. He admitted that he’s forced new practices by sharing some key messages only to an internal microsharing network—spreading the word verbally that people had to log in there to learn what’s up. The tactic worked, by the way, and while there, people saw other threads they wanted to weigh in on. Our conversation also uncovered that we’d each worked with two characters who had influenced us in powerful ways. One an English entrepreneur, the other a former Yale professor. It was unlikely enough we’d each worked with both of them (at different times) yet each of us crossing their paths still seems statistically impossible. It reminded us that a simple lunch will provide a springboard for further learning from 6986 miles away. Do I think we’d have met if it weren’t for the HR Tech Conference? Possibly. Would social media ever foster an exchange about these mutual colleagues? Unlikely. “Friends we have in common” requires those friends are social online and so far not everyone’s onboard.

The other invaluable conversation was with the insightful Ben Brooks. Before meeting in person, we met one another over Twitter at the #ibmexperience event a few weeks before in New York and then again in a session at HR Tech. We were simultaneously capturing and tweeting many of the same points, mostly about the humanness collaborative technologies bring into the workplace. We were also co-smirking at comments like, “[The HR] space is mega exciting” and tweet-applauding speakers for avoiding jargon to talk about the upside of a profession that should never lose sight people matter most of all.

I look foreword to next years conference in Las Vegas and witnessing HR leaders stepping back into the light, using technology and their deep care for people as a way for organizations to shine.

{ 4 comments }

I’m in a session on social learning at #hrtechconf, lead by Jeanne Meister author of The 2020 Workplace. The audience is wrestling with what is social learning. As someone who has spent a little time focused on this recently, here’s how I define it.

The text version:

Social media is technology used to engage three or more people.
Social learning is participating with others to make sense of new ideas.
What’s new is how powerfully they work together.

That work for you?

If this helps you, you might want to add this slide to your presentations when you want to explain social learning to others. Learn with them, after all. You might want to get a copy of The New Social Learning, too.

{ 4 comments }

#hcoc 032609

Forming a committee to develop a social media strategy didn’t seem right to Greg Matthews, director of consumer innovation at Humana. He saw advantages in encouraging the company’s 28,500 employees to begin to incorporate new practices, and wanted to demonstrate an alternative approach to even the early work. His team’s charter, after all, was to explore the leading edge of technology and business practices, and to act as a conduit to bring those practices into Humana’s ecosystem.

Five minutes before meeting for the first time with the people Matthews refers to as the “uncommittee,” he framed a plan: encourage the representatives from 14 departments across the company to use Twitter to take notes of the meeting, broadcast their ideas, and collectively watch the conversation stream so that they could learn which ideas resonated across groups.

They established a code “#hcoc” (in Twitter lingo called a hashtag because it begins with #), used in each tweet to track the conversation for Humana Social Network Chamber of Commerce, and set out to learn what happens when form follows function.

Before you conclude, “We couldn’t do that” or “Our organization doesn’t support Twitter within our firewall,” keep in mind that at the time of this meeting, neither did Humana. Some reports estimate that more than 70 percent of large organizations today ban Twitter, Facebook, and other social media tools within their firewalls.

Yet Matthews (@chimoose on Twitter) recognized that most of the uncommittee members carried personal, smart mobile devices (one reason they were familiar with the practice of microsharing, or microblogging), and they could use them to tweet during the meetings.

With widespread adoption of mobile devices worldwide, organizations that believe blocking social media access is their best defense, sidestep considering how the tools already help their employees succeed. Rather than banning social media tools, companies ought to consider educating their employees on how to use the tools responsibly and to begin learning how these tools can benefit more people. Workplace learning professionals who understand these tools and who can make a case for their use are in a strong position to help their organizations navigate and climb new terrain.

Turn over stones

Although Humana’s uncommittee is still new and each member has a different full-time job to keep them busy, they know that health, and the health system, has to change. For Humana to continue leading through innovation and focusing on consumers, they have a steep climb ahead. Working socially (through microsharing, and in a distributed way) stretches their capabilities and accesses 28,500 other people who can help.

They’ve presented to IT on issues of security, access development, and toolsets, sharing what they have learned first-hand to at least help the technical teams see wider options. They are beginning to meet with and talk to Humana’s legal team on issues of intellectual property, compliance, liability, and indemnity. And that work synchronizes perfectly with human resources as they focus on creating a culture of collaboration: hiring, training, and recognizing people for sharing.

To get as many other people ready as possible, Matthew’s Consumer Innovation team also created a series of self-guided training modules for employees to learn about various social media tools without becoming overwhelmed. People can spend a little time each day to get up to speed and gain a sense of how these resources can help them.

“LinkedIn in 15 Minutes a Day,” for instance, offers employees a chance to learn enough about the new media to have some comfort when testing it out on their own. Other 15-minute courses introduce the basics of Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. The team has also created custom content intended to facilitate sessions on subjects including RSS feeds and readers, blogging, search engine optimization, and social campaigns 101.

Reach beyond walls

After meeting, Bonnie C. Hathcock, Humana’s senior vice president of human resources, became curious about what was happening on their internal microsharing system, so she created an account and logged in. (Also referred to as “Enterprise Twitter,” there are web-based applications, comparable to Twitter, designed specifically to work within an organization, sometimes as SaaS and other times inside the firewall. Some internal microsharing tools, including Socialcast, Yammer, Socialtext Signals, and Present.ly, allow for messages longer than Twitter’s 140-character limit. Some do not.)

The first question Hathcock asked was, “I am seeking to understand why people would use [this tool]. Feel free to respond and share how or why you use it.” She was pleasantly surprised by the quantity and quality of responses she received. In nearly 80 replies, she heard comments including, “I use it because it makes a 28,000-person company feel like a 280-person company. It makes [our organization] smarter, more nimble, and more personal.”

Other employees responded:

  • “It has allowed me to become more involved with various social and socially conscious groups at Humana that I never knew existed before.”
  • “Celebrities have discovered Twitter and are using it to reach fans in an unprecedented, interactive way. Company executives can do the same thing.”
  • “I use [this system] to connect with others in [Humana’s] Learning Consortium and to stay up-to-date on projects that are going on in other areas of the business.”
  • “…Your initial post is EXACTLY how [this tool] is used. Seeking a quick answer from a broad range of people.”

The experience attracted Hathcock to the idea of using microsharing as a vehicle to connect with more associates. Her responses echoed her newfound appreciation for this unlikely medium. “I love the positivity about our culture… I am equally interested in what we could do to be better. [We all] create the defining difference in establishing and sustaining a distinctive competitive and adaptive advantage.” She was able to use a simple tool, which took very little time away from the rest of her responsibilities, to engage with people across her organization, and to learn from them—and them with her.

Answers amid echoes

Humana’s uncommittee seeks and answers questions through meetings every few weeks. Rather than big bulky presentations, they continue to share information in short bursts. On the agenda are brief updates from the last meeting, a quick presentation from a member on how his department is using social media (what is it, how and why did they do it, and what have they learned), a slightly longer interactive presentation from an outsider who offers a fresh voice, and a few updates from one or more workgroups.

While there’s nothing groundbreaking in their approach to meetings, Matthews reports that it’s the only team he’s been on that has nearly 100 percent attendance at every meeting. People get out as much as they put in and have specific details and insights—answers to their organization’s challenges—available to them from others who are thinking about similar things. It also helps that they’ve created an environment to learn where no one has the authority to tell them to stop doing what they’re doing or that what they’ve done is wrong. It’s a learning work-in-progress.

Between meetings, they continue to tweet and use their internal microsharing system. This gives them both answers in real-time and a sense of who else in the organization is uncovering solutions that might apply in another department. For example, they learned techniques for creating and promoting YouTube videos from Humana’s marketing team (who had created the “Stay Smart, Stay Healthy” video), to create their own video, “Crumple It Up” (www.youtube.com/crumpleitup). The little gems, the answers between the questions, keeps the learning continuous and fresh.

Since that first cross-department uncommittee get-together, social approaches to working together have spread throughout Humana. This can be credited to a network approach where no one department owns social media for the large organization. Individual groups, often with separate customers and demographics, consider their individual social media needs and budgets, knowing people in other groups are there to support and assist.

They’ve fused high- and low-tech solutions for connecting people with information. On one hand, Humana was early among large companies to get information off of paper and onto their intranet, but their relationship-driven culture also supports accessing tribal knowledge the old-fashioned way, person-to-person. With an outward-in approach, Humana demonstrates that they are inquisitive, flexible, and able to learn from every step. If they can do it, without explicit authority or even sanctioned access to tools… What’s stopping you from stepping up?

Originally published in ASTD T+D by Marcia Conner.

{ 1 comment }

The New Social Learning is Born

Today is the official release for The New Social Learning and I want to take this opportunity to tell you a little about the book and also reflect on what I’ve learned since we signed off on the final draft in June. The comparison between birthing a book and birthing a baby wasn’t obvious the [...]

more…

Enterprise Microlearning

If you can’t fathom how Twitter can help your company, read on. When a student opened fire on the Virginia Tech campus in 2007, the school had no systematic way to alert those in harm’s way. In the days that followed, organizations nationwide began asking, “Does my organization have the ability, in a few minutes, [...]

more…

Where to Begin

One type of work I do with organizations on their road to more collaborative and social relationship-oriented cultures is to surface their organizing principles. These are the core beliefs, assumptions, and values that guides their behaviors and decisions. These are the bedrock rules that keep them on course. While a few organizations have thought about [...]

more…

Shoot An Arrow, Draw A Target Around It

The mere mention of a test makes hearts race and palms sweat. Err, umm, I have someplace else to be… More than any other, the word test draws gut-level memories of difficult times in school-like settings when we felt unprepared or manipulated to learn something that didn’t seem very important—and then have someone else evaluate [...]

more…